Sally and I have coined the phrase “Mongolian standard time”
to describe how slow things sometimes happen here. Mongolians tend to be laid
back. They are never in a hurry by American standards even when they say they
are in a hurry. It is not uncommon for people to arrive to a meeting a few
minutes late. If someone is on time to any event then they are early.
As an American it would be easy to describe this laid back
perspective as lazy, but that is not accurate. They do work hard. When it comes
to schedules, they are just accommodating to the weather conditions, the travel
conditions, and someone’s general mood. Mongolian Standard is difficult for an
American to adjust to. It is especially difficult for those Americans that had
the wherewithal to apply for the Peace Corps. I have learned to just roll with
it. I make a habit of arriving on time to events so as to be early. I try not
to become annoyed if someone is late in meeting me. In America this is a sign
of disrespect or not caring, but here they are simply late because they are
late. They are not trying to offend; rather there was something else happening
that really seemed to demand their attention. It is as if everyone’s internal
clock is running 10 to 30 minutes behind.
As I have adjusted, I have found Mongolian standard to be
incredibly relaxing. Imagine if you will, never having to be in a hurry to
anything. Imagine letting all of the stress that comes with being on time go,
because no one is socially holding you accountable. The potential to view lost
time as not wasted minutes, but time to do something else soothes the soul.
Another aspect of Mongolian standard is schedule planning
(Төлөвлөгөө). Sometimes by American standards the schedule seems completely
empty, because it has not been filled with events. With Mongolian standard and
a laid back perspective, planning in the long term can be extremely difficult.
There is just not an emphasis placed on goals or planning events until they are
almost upon us. This can be stressful and has the potential to cause problems
or possibly activities that are not as good as they could be with better
planning.
|
Chinggis Square in UB |
Foreign policy is completely different here. In a recent
speech during the summer, the Mongolian Prime Minister said that Mongolia was a
pony caught between a bear and a dragon, referring to Russia and China. At the
time, my fellow trainees and I decided that Mongolia was not a pony given the
strength of the people; rather, they are a falcon. Still there is little a
falcon can do to a bear or dragon. When Mongolia became a democracy 25 years
ago, it became necessary to adopt a foreign policy that would ensure survival
and diplomacy.
Partly for this reason, Mongolia was one of the first
countries to declare itself a nuclear free zone. During a time when the arms
race was drawing to a conclusion, Mongolia simply stated that they would have
nothing to do with it. This policy generated a lot of respect from other
countries including the US.
With a lack of resources, but an immensity of land, it
became necessary to make treaties with both Russia and China. The purpose of
these treaties were to protect Mongolia in case one of these giants invaded. In
the event of an invasion, the other giant would be called upon to aid Mongolia.
The third tier of foreign policy was to reach out
diplomatically to countries that would assist in trade and resources. These
countries include first world developments like the US, Japan, Canada, and
South Korea. However, Mongolia lacks a lot of infrastructure, so it is easy for
richer countries to take advantage of Mongolian resources. For example,
Canadian corporations have some rights to mining in Mongolia. By providing the
infrastructure to access resources, these corporations take the vast majority
of the profit from the land without returning much to Mongolia. This is one of several
reasons for the decline in Mongolia’s economy.
In the US, we adopt a completely different foreign policy.
It is debatable that we may have more resources than any other country in the
world. We also believe ourselves to possess the most powerful military in the
world. These two tiers along with some freedom of capitalism allow for a more
aggressive foreign policy. The purpose of this blog post is not to debate what
is right, only to point out our differences. A country that operates in what we
title developing nation capacity must tackle issues of foreign policy in a
completely different way.
|
This picture from UB illustrates Mongolia Culture. The clash of the new technological age and tradition. |
Pride is another characteristic the Mongolian people have.
They possess pride in their country, their culture, and way of life. They are
incredibly proud of their land and the beauty of this country. They are proud
of all the nuances of tradition from music to games to food and clothes. The
culture is rich and definable. They are proud of their language and the
traditional script. Pride in one’s country is a good thing.
This is not a cultural difference from America. We too are
proud of our country and way of life. However, as an American something that I
find myself learning as I travel abroad is that every single country in the
world, every last one, is just as proud of themselves as we are. We tend to
think we are the biggest, richest, most powerful country in the world. I stress
the awareness that everyone loves their country as much as we do. As every
person is different with different strengths and weaknesses, so are all
countries unique. The assumption of superiority is disgusting to anyone who
also loves their country and is not conducive to healthy diplomacy. In a land
where we stress equality of people, we should be among the first to stress
equality of countries.
~Caleb